Wednesday, April 12, 2006
What's in a hybrid surname?
Genderbenders
First, do read the blog piece and comments on the link above to make sense of my writing. Well, I could'nt agree more with what Nikita says on her blog about the female surname as an instrument to push old sexist concepts. Nonetheless, I take off from where some of the comments end.
Disclaimer: No offence intended to potential namesakes.
Assume that you have the first generation of kids with hybrid surnames. What do you do when they marry? What would their kids names be? I illustrate with an example.
First generation couple, each of whose parents were progressive and gave them hybrid surnames - Mr. Rahul Aggrawal-Singh and Ms. Sonia Lobo-Raut. They now have a daughter called Avantika. What surname do they give her?
Avantika Aggrawal-Singh-Lobo-Raut???
I'm not harbouring any sexist ideas myself, while writing this. I don't have the right solution, but there's a bit of a problem here with hybrid surnames :-)
Comments:
Links to this post:
<< Home
why not Avantika FirstNameofMom FirstNameofDad? or Avantika Leila (random, nice last name)
What's with the 'Singhs' and 'Lobos' and 'Khans' in any case?
What's with the 'Singhs' and 'Lobos' and 'Khans' in any case?
Nikita - Your idea sounds interesting. You sure have been doing a lot of thinking on this topic!
Singh, Lobo, Raut and Aggrawal.
They were all inter-caste marriages. Getting more progressive :-)
Post a Comment
Singh, Lobo, Raut and Aggrawal.
They were all inter-caste marriages. Getting more progressive :-)
Links to this post:
<< Home
